Post by xyz2900 on Feb 11, 2024 9:29:49 GMT 1
The Federal Supreme Court prohibited CPMI dos Correios from breaking the banking, tax and telephone secrecy of the company Euro Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários. Minister Marco Aurélio granted an injunction on a Writ of Mandamus filed by the company, which operates in the intermediation of business with money from private supplementary pension entities. According to the decision, even if CPMI dos Correios has confidential information, it is prevented from using the company's data in investigations, until the final judgment of the Writ of Mandamus. For Marco Aurélio, the object of CPMI's investigation is not the company's actions, but the pension funds mentioned by the commission, including Petrus, Eletrus, Centrus, Previ and others.
At issue, from the perspective of the object, is not the investigation, in itself, of acts carried out by the petitioner, but by the supplementary pension funds mentioned,” he stated.The preventive writ of mandamus appears appropriate, considering the circumstance that it is the action of a parliamentary Belize Email List commission of inquiry, that is, the involvement of the possible practice of an act that does not, in itself, concern the main activity, the economy internal to the Legislature. At stake is, again, commission action taking into account the investigative powers of the judicial authorities. As with the latter, preventive action is possible. Furthermore, observe the justification contained in the request.
At issue, from the perspective of the object, is not the investigation, in itself, of acts carried out by the petitioner, but by the supplementary pension funds mentioned. At first examination, the request to prevent the breaking of banking, tax and telephone secrecy of those who acted as agents and, therefore, in the field of professional activity, intermediating business based on instructions received by the client, is relevant. 3. I grant the precautionary measure to, until the final judgment of this writ of mandamus, impede the aforementioned breach, not ruling out the possibility of the Joint Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry analyzing the request formulated - No. 1,174, of 2005 -, in the which could even result in losses from this petition. 4. Request information.
At issue, from the perspective of the object, is not the investigation, in itself, of acts carried out by the petitioner, but by the supplementary pension funds mentioned,” he stated.The preventive writ of mandamus appears appropriate, considering the circumstance that it is the action of a parliamentary Belize Email List commission of inquiry, that is, the involvement of the possible practice of an act that does not, in itself, concern the main activity, the economy internal to the Legislature. At stake is, again, commission action taking into account the investigative powers of the judicial authorities. As with the latter, preventive action is possible. Furthermore, observe the justification contained in the request.
At issue, from the perspective of the object, is not the investigation, in itself, of acts carried out by the petitioner, but by the supplementary pension funds mentioned. At first examination, the request to prevent the breaking of banking, tax and telephone secrecy of those who acted as agents and, therefore, in the field of professional activity, intermediating business based on instructions received by the client, is relevant. 3. I grant the precautionary measure to, until the final judgment of this writ of mandamus, impede the aforementioned breach, not ruling out the possibility of the Joint Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry analyzing the request formulated - No. 1,174, of 2005 -, in the which could even result in losses from this petition. 4. Request information.